Jugendamtsterror und Familienrechtsverbrechen - Kindesentführungen-Kindesentziehungen

Germany: CHILD ABDUCTION PREVENTION

Germany: CHILD ABDUCTION PREVENTION

Germany

CHILD ABDUCTION PREVENTION

The following is an extract from Germany's answers to a questionnaire submitted by the Hague Conference on Private International Law concerning the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction:

1. Please give details of any civil legislative provisions which exist in your State which may act as a deterrent to a potential abductor, or may have a preventive effect.

In particular, the following provisions under civil law can have a deterring or preventive effect:

a) An abductor must expect to be confronted by a right to the return of the child under section 1632 [1] of the German Civil Code (BGB). The proviso to this is that the child is being illegally retained from the entitled parent. If the parents have joint custody, then retaining the child and requiring its return can both be unlawful. Therefore, the order to return the child requires an examination of the child's best interests.

b) Furthermore, a parent who illegally retains the child from the other parent and endangers the physical, mental or emotional well-being of the child in the process can lose parental custody either entirely or in respect of certain aspects through a measure by the Family Court pursuant to section 1666 [1] BGB.

c) In addition, mention is made of the provision of section 1671 BGB. This provision regulates cases in which parents who have joint custody are not only living apart temporarily. In this case, sole parental custody or partial parental custody can be granted to only one of the parents upon request if it can be expected that this is in keeping with the best interests of the child.

d) If the abductor had the right of access to the child, ensuing from the abduction, it can also be ordered that the visitation procedures be changed (section 1684 [3] BGB) or, pursuant to section 1684 [4] BGB, that the right of access be restricted or disallowed.


Pursuant to section 1684 [3] in conjunction with subsection [2] BGB, the Family Court can specify the extent of the right of access and its exercise (in respect of third parties) more strictly and by court order require those concerned to comply with their obligation to refrain from any actions that interfere with the child's relationship to the other parent or impede the child's upbringing. In so far as it is necessary in the best interests of the child (section 1684 [4], first sentence, BGB), i.e. in long-term measures, and if the child's welfare would otherwise be endangered (section 1684 [4], second sentence, BGB), the Family Court can either restrict or disallow right of access. If the other parent should make the probability of abduction sufficiently convincing through adequately concrete factual testimony, the family court's procedure is to either disallow access or to order that access only be allowed when a willingly involved third party is present (cf. section 1684 [4], third sentence).

There are other measures available in addition to this which can regulate the exercise of right of access more narrowly. Such measures may include, in particular, geographical restrictions and conditions in regard to the exercise of right of access.

Examples:

However, thus far, measures of this kind have seldom been ordered in court practice. It can however be expected that these measures will be put into practice to a considerably greater degree upon the entering into effect of the European Convention on Contact Concerning Children.

Pursuant to section 1684 [3] second sentence BGB, the Family Court can, by court orders containing the aforementioned details, also require the parent having right of access to fulfil the obligations imposed on them. To this end, pursuant to section 33 subsection 1, first sentence, of the Act on Non-Contentious Matters, the court can impose fines in order to enforce its orders. In individual cases, this too can have a deterring or preventive effect vis-a-vis potential abductors.

e) If the abductor has a right to maintenance in respect of the parent from whom the child is being withheld, under the conditions set forth in section 1579 no. 6 BGB, such parents right to maintenance can be restricted by a Family Court decision. Pursuant to this, maintenance can be denied, reduced or limited for a time, if, even in safeguarding the interests of a joint child entrusted to the entitled parent, making the obligor liable would be grossly inequitable.

f) Furthermore, the abductor must expect to make good on claims to compensation by the parent having custody. Such claims could be provided under section 823 [1] BGB on account of interference with parental custody. Compensable damage can consist in, e.g. the costs incurred in returning the child or also in the costs of a detective investigating the whereabouts of the child. Section 823 [2] BGB can also give rise to a claim to damages as a result of a violation of a protective law (e.g. section 235 of the Criminal Code (Child Stealing)).


2. Please give details of any criminal legislative provisions which exist in your State which may act as a deterrent to a potential abductor, or may have a preventive effect.

>From the standpoint of criminal law, depending on the specific circumstances, abductions can be regarded as

In the case of a kidnapping for the purposes of extortion, reference is made primarily to Kidnapping for Extortion (section 239a StGB).

The differing degrees of criminal liability content and injustice which the aforementioned offences constitute are set forth in the minimum sentences by which they are punishable. Whereas kidnapping for extortion and hostage taking are generally punishable with a prison sentence of no less that five years (up to 15 years), serious trafficking in human beings, kidnapping, child stealing, trafficking in children and deprivation of liberty are punishable with lesser minimum sentences.

Serious Trafficking in Human Beings: as a rule, prison sentence of no less than one year (up to ten years);Kidnapping: as a rule, prison sentence of no less than one year (up to 15 years);Child Stealing, Trafficking in Children and Deprivation of Liberty: as a rule, prison sentence of one month (up to three or five years) or a fine, in serious cases, prison sentence of no less than six months or no less than one year (up to ten years).

In the case of child stealing, deprivation of liberty, kidnapping for extortion and hostage taking, the minimum prison sentence is increased if the offender causes the death of the abducted victim through negligence (carelessness).

Kidnapping for Extortion and Hostage Taking resulting in death caused by carelessness: prison sentence of no less than ten years or life; Child Stealing and Deprivation of Liberty resulting in death caused by negligence: as a rule, prison sentence of no less than three years (up to 15 years).

Anyone could be the victim of severe trafficking in human beings, kidnapping, deprivation of liberty, kidnapping for extortion or hostage taking. The victim of child stealing or trafficking in children can only be adolescents (section 235 (1) no 1 StGB, section 236 (2) StGB) or children (section 235 (1) no. 2 StGB, section 236 (1) StGB).

Whoever forms an organisation, the objectives or activity of which are directed towards the commission of abductions, which under the criminal code constitute severe trafficking in human beings, kidnapping, child stealing, trafficking in children or deprivation of liberty, or whoever participates in such an organisation as a member, recruits for it or supports it, will be punished with imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine pursuant to section 129 (1) StGB.

Whoever forms an organisation, the objectives or activity of which are directed towards the commission of abductions, which under the criminal code constitute kidnapping for extortion or hostage taking, or whoever participates in such an organisation as a member, will be punished with imprisonment from no less than one to ten years pursuant to section 129a (1) no. 2 StGB. Whoever supports such an organisation or recruits members or supporters for it, will be punished with imprisonment from six months to five years (section 129a (3) StGB).

Pursuant to section 129b of the StGB, which entered into effect on 30 August 2002, sections 129 and 129a StGB also apply to organisations in foreign countries.


3. Please give details of any court orders which can be obtained during, for example, divorce or custody proceedings which prohibit, restrict or criminalise removal or retention of a child.

Court orders can be obtained either in connection with divorce proceedings (under the Act to Reform the Law on Parent and Child Matters as an ancillary matter only upon filing a request, section 623 subsections (2), (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure - ZPO) or also separately (sections 621,621a ZPO; section 64 FGG), albeit primarily by filing a request. On the material basis of section 1666 BGB (Jeopardy to the Welfare of the Child), the Family Court can, however, take action proprio motu as well and take any decisions it considers reasonable. The execution of the orders is regulated under section 33 FGG (section 621a ZPO), i.e. the court orders can be enforced through the imposition of fines, coercive detention or direct force. Where there are indications of impending non-compliance with the orders, the enforcement measure can be warned of in the decision on right of access or custody restrictions itself, in order to make more expedient imposition and execution possible later.

In the event that one parent impedes or prevents the implementation of an (already imposed) right of access, a court mediation proceeding (section 52a FGG) is possible (application proceedings).

In particular, the following court orders should be mentioned, by which the removal/retention of a child are prohibited, restricted or subjected to punishment:

a) If there are indications of the threat of child abduction, to begin with, the right of access of the potential abductor can restricted pursuant to section 1684 [4] BGB. The orders possible pursuant to section 1684 [4] BGB are:

a) If there are indications of the threat of child abduction, moreover, the potential abductor's right to determine the child's place of residence can be revoked pursuant to section 1666 [1] BGB. In certain circumstances, this can be combined with the prohibition to inform such parent of the child's whereabouts.


4. Please give details of any court orders which can be obtained in emergency situations. Can these orders be obtained out-of-hours and ex parte?

In emergency situations, the Family Court can implement all the measures by interim injunction which are listed under question A.3. in response to an ex parte application. In exceptional cases, the court can order such measures under the conditions stipulated in section 1666 [1] BGB either proprio motu or at the request of the competent Youth Welfare Office. In cases involving the endangerment to the welfare of the child, the Family Court can also order that the Youth Welfare Office be granted custody of the child pursuant to section 42 of the Eighth Book of the Social Code (SGB VIII).

Court orders of this nature can also be obtained out-of-hours and ex parte. In doing so, the fact must be taken into consideration that at certain times on weekends and holidays and out-of-hours many Local Courts either cannot be reached or are difficult to reach. As a result of the Federal Constitutional Court decision of 15 May 2002 2 BvR 2292/00- (official collection of judgments by the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGE) Volume 105, pages 239 - 252 = Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2002, pages 3161 et. seq.)


5. Do you have any comments relating to relocation orders?

and

6. Do you have any other comments relating to legislative provisions, court orders or administrative measures including any comments on the effectiveness of these provisions, and how often they are used in practice?


For the question as to how one can prevent possible/imminent abductions, the following considerations could be of interest, which are basically of no consequence in the context of relocation applications filed after an abduction has already taken place.

The application of preventive measures seems to be a necessity, particularly where highly quarrelsome couples are concerned. Conversely, cases involving couples who can reach an agreement on their own, or perhaps with professional help, an abduction of the shared child should generally not be a concern. In cases involving highly quarrelsome couples for whom an amicable settlement after separation is not possible for a variety of different reasons, more often than not however, an agreement will be unsuccessful due to an absence of voluntariness, as well as a lack of willingness to compromise and acquiescence.

The dilemma that makes prevention so difficult is the range of motives and situations in life from which an abduction can stem. As a result, a parent whose actions are selfishly motivated (e.g. in order to deliberately cause harm to the others by stealing the child) will not easily allow themselves to be persuaded against their decision.

There are also situations in which one parent takes the shared child (particularly in a bi-national relationship), with them after separation (e.g. to their country of origin), since they could not make a living in their previous place of residence and cannot support the child, either because they were not permitted to work, or because they could not work (e.g. because the child is still too small or there are several children etc.). In such a case, the removal for purely financial reasons could perhaps be dealt with by way of a consequent judgment on maintenance which obliges the parent earning an income to pay sufficient maintenance.

An additional reason a parent might take a child without the consent or against the will of the other parent is frequently the fear of not being allowed to see the child (regularly) after the separation. This fear could be allayed by way of a decision regarding right of access, which grants the parent, in whose household the child does not live, a generous right of access.

In this context, it is of great importance to put the other parent's fear to rest that the child will not be brought back after exercise of the right of access. This is where the measures provided by the European Convention on Contact concerning Children can be of great help toward the protection of the child and building up trust between the parents.

Measures of this nature, which offer incentives not to "abscond with" the child, would presumably achieve more frequent success than would sanctions. Nevertheless, particularly a parent acting out of selfish motives will not allow themselves to be easily persuaded by this. In these cases, sanctions must be applied, whose deterring effect is certainly undisputed, but the complete avoidance of which will ultimately not be feasible.

This conceivably includes a battery of sanctions, which could range from criminal prosecution to the forfeiture of custody/right of access, to the forfeiture of one's own claim to (spousal) support.

Finally, the strictest possible implementation of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (HK) after an abduction has taken place would presumably be successful in achieving deterring effects. Albeit, it has not been proven that as a result of this a parent refrains completely from abduction. Based on the experiences of the German Central Authority, however, it may be safely assumed that abduction, at least in a country which - both in respect of relocation orders, as well as their compulsory execution - strictly applies and enforces the Hague Convention on Child Abduction, demands thorough contemplation (and occasionally the abducting parent even selects a country of refuge to which they may not have any connection, but which is known for not enforcing the Hague Convention on Child Abduction with the required degree of rigorousness).

In view of this, the greater part of relocation orders by German courts are in compliance with the convention, whereas successful enforcement is more frequently the exception. In the Central Authority's view, this is an area where action needs to be taken also with regard to -- but not merely -- preventive measures.



Contact Us

Jeremy D. Morley

International Family Law
230 Park Avenue, 10th Floor
New York, NY 10169

Tel: (212) 372-3425
Fax: (815) 301-6742

https://www.international-divorce.com/ca-germany_2.htm

Re: Germany: CHILD ABDUCTION PREVENTION

Gibt es das auch in deutscher Fassung?

Danke & LG Einemama

Re: Germany: CHILD ABDUCTION PREVENTION

Ehe und Familie
Kindesentführung


Kindesentführungen unter Eheleuten sind nicht erst seit Betty Mahmoodys Buch »Nicht ohne meine Tochter« ein aktuelles Problem. Immer mehr Eltern nehmen inzwischen das Gesetz in die eigenen Hände und entführen ihre Kinder, um die Sorgerechtsregelung zu umgehen. Entführungen innerhalb der Familie kommen dabei besonders häufig in binationalen Ehen vor. Geht die Beziehung in die Brüche, setzt sich einer der Partner mit dem Kind oder den Kindern ins Heimatland ab. Und da der Krieg um das Sorgerecht für die Kinder die Emotionen hochputscht, bleibt für den Blick auf internationale Regelungen erst gar keine Zeit. Bevor hier der Ehekrieg auf dem Rücken der Kinder ausgetragen wird, sollte lieber auf Vorbeugung gesetzt werden. Und da gibt es praktische Möglichkeiten.

29. März 98 - der schrecklichste Tag im Leben von Astrid Aden. Der Tag, an dem ihre Kinder entführt wurden. Nach einem Besuchstermin bringt ihr geschiedener Mann die Kinder nicht mehr zurück. Wochenlang weiß sie nicht, wo ihre Kinder sind.

Astrid Aden:
Ja, ich habe Kontakte zu einem Privatdetektiv gehabt mit der Absicht, den Aufenthalt eigentlich der Kinder zu ermitteln und dann mit Hilfe des Generalbundesanwalts die Kinder zurückzuholen, was allerdings erfolglos blieb.

Weil der Vater der Kinder Franzose ist, erstattet sie Strafanzeige in Frankreich. Damit ist der Vorgang im Pariser Zentralcomputer. Doch auch dort bleibt die Suche zunächst erfolglos. Niemand weiß: Die Kinder sind im französisch verwalteten Neu-Kaledonien.

Astrid Aden:
Meine Kinder besuchten auf der Insel eine französische Schule. Und das kam den Lehrern und auch dem Rektor doch eigenartig vor, dass die Kinder kein Französisch sprachen. Die haben dann aus Eigeninitiative sich mit der örtlichen Polizei auf der Insel in Kontakt gesetzt und die hatten das über den Zentralcomputer, den Pariser Zentralcomputer gleich erfassen können, dass die Kinder gesucht werden und dass auch gegen den Vater eine Strafanzeige läuft.

Astrid Aden fliegt sofort zu ihren Kindern ans andere Ende der Welt. Sieben Wochen verbringt sie auf der Insel, um eine Ausreisegenehmigung für die Söhne zu bekommen. Eine Odyssee durch Behörden und Gerichte.

Kindesentführung durch die eigenen Eltern. Im Scheidungskrieg nicht selten das letzte Mittel aus Angst, die Kinder zu verlieren. Im Entführungsfall ins Ausland steht der verlassene Elternteil nicht völlig schutzlos da. Seit 1991 gibt es das Haager Kindesentführungsabkommen, das zahlreiche Staaten unterzeichnet haben.

Ziel dieses Abkommens ist:

* Die sofortige Rückführung des Kindes in seine alte Umgebung (auch bei einer Entführung durch den sorgeberechtigten Elternteil) und

* Beachtung des bestehenden Sorge- und Besuchsrechts.


Im Entführungsfall sollte der betroffene Elternteil einen Rückführungsantrag beim Generalbundesanwalt stellen. Die zentrale Behörde in Bonn arbeitet dann eng mit den ausländischen Behörden zusammen und bietet weitere Unterstützung an.

Wolfgang Weitzel, Bundesanwaltschaft Zentrale Behörde:
Wenn die ausländische zentrale Behörde beispielsweise die Vorlage von bestimmten Urkunden noch für erforderlich hält oder Rückfragen hat, richtet Sie sie wieder über die deutsche zentrale Behörde an den antragstellenden Elternteil. Das heißt, die deutsche zentrale Behörde hat insoweit schon hier Funktionen zwischen dem antragstellenden Elternteil und der ausländischen zentralen Behörde.

In islamischen Ländern ist diese Behörde machtlos. Die Gründe: Diese Länder haben das Abkommen nicht unterzeichnet. Zum anderen: Das Familienrecht ist dort stark religiös geprägt. Eine Ausreise des Kindes ohne Zustimmung des Vaters ist nicht möglich. In solchen Fällen müssen Eltern besondere Maßnahmen treffen:

* Anträge sowohl in Deutschland als auch im Ausland stellen

* einen Antrag stellen bei einem deutschen Familiengericht auf
-Herausgabe des Kindes und auf
-Übertragung des Sorgerechts im Wege der einstweiligen Anordnung

* und einen Herausgabebeschluss bei dem ausländischen Gericht beantragen


Viele denken an ein Strafverfahren, um den anderen Elternteil unter Druck zu setzen, doch das ist nicht immer sinnvoll.

Wolfgang Weitzel, Bundesanwaltschaft Zentrale Behörde:
Ich würde in jedem Fall von strafrechtlichen Maßnahmen abraten, wenn eine auch noch so geringe Chance besteht, dass der entführende Elternteil durch die zentralen Behörden des Partnerstaates oder durch Familienangehörige zur Rückkehr oder zur Rückgabe des Kindes bewegt werden kann.

Das Wichtigste in einem Rückführungsverfahren ist die Zeit. Je länger das Verfahren dauert und das Kind dabei im Ausland ist, desto schwieriger wird die Rückführung. Nur wenn das Kind noch nicht in die neue Umgebung integriert ist, besteht die Chance, dass das Gericht es wieder nach Hause schickt. Deshalb ganz wichtig: vorher handeln, um eine mögliche Entführung zu verhindern.

Also:

* Kindergarten oder Schule von einer drohenden Entführung informieren

* bei Gericht im Wege der einstweiligen Anordnung ein Ausreiseverbot für den Ehepartner beantragen

* eine Ausfertigung davon an die Grenzschutzdirektion in Koblenz schicken und im Schengener Informationssystem speichern lassen

* Übergabe des Reisepasses während der Besuchszeiten verlangen


Astrid Aden hat es geschafft. Ihre beiden Kinder durften von Neu-Kaledonien mit der Mutter wieder nach Hause fahren. Doch die Angst sitzt tief, der Vater könnte sie wieder mitnehmen.

Informationen

Seit dem 1.12.1990 gibt es internationale Hilfe bei Kindesentführungen.
An diesem Tag ist in Deutschland das »Haager Übereinkommen über die zivilrechtlichen Aspekte internationaler Kindesentführungen vom 25. Oktober 1980« in Kraft getreten.

Haager Kindesentführungsabkommen

Dieses Abkommen gilt aber nur in den Ländern, die das Abkommen mit unterzeichnet haben.

Derzeitige Vertragsstaaten sind zur Zeit (Stand Juni 1999):
Argentinien, Australien, Bahamas, Belarus, Belgien, Belize, Bosnien/Herzegowina, Burkina Faso, Chile, Dänemark, Ecuador, Finnland, Frankreich, Georgien, Griechenland, Honduras, Hongkong, Irland, Island, Israel, Italien, Jugoslawien (Serbien, Montenegro), Kanada, Kolumbien, Kroatien, Luxemburg, Mauritius, Mazedonien, Mexico, Monaco, Neuseeland, Niederlande, Norwegen, Österreich, Panama, Polen, Portugal, Rumänien, Saint Kitts und Nevis, Schweden, Schweiz, Simbabwe, Slowenien, Spanien, Südafrika, Tschechien, Turkmenistan, Ungarn, Venezuela, Vereinigtes Königreich (Großbritannien), Vereinigte Staaten (USA), Zypern. (Quelle: Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof)

Wird ein Kind in ein solches Land entführt, dann sollten sich die betroffenen Elternteile an die Zentrale Behörde wenden, die in jedem der Vertragsstaaten eingerichtet ist. In Deutschland ist das:

Der Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof
Zentrale Behörde
Heinemannstr. 6
53175 Bonn
Tel.: 01888-583-0
Fax: 01888-583-4800

Dort kann ein Antrag auf Rückführung des Kindes gestellt werden. Die Behörde setzt sich dann mit der Behörde des Landes in Verbindung, in das das Kind entführt wurde. Wird das Kind gefunden, dann wird es in der Regel schnell in sein Heimatland zurückgebracht.

Problematisch wird es in der Regel dann, wenn das Kind in ein Land entführt wurde, das das Abkommen nicht unterzeichnet hat. Hervorzuheben sind hier insbesondere die islamischen Länder. Häufig dürfen die Kinder das Land nicht ohne Erlaubnis des dort ansässigen Elternteils verlassen. Einige legale Möglichkeiten gibt es jedoch.

Verfahren bei Nicht-Vertragsstaaten

* sämtliche Anträge müssen sowohl in Deutschland als auch im Aufenthaltsland des Kindes gestellt werden. Grund: ein deutscher Gerichtsbeschluss wird dort nicht generell anerkannt

* zunächst Antrag bei einem deutschen Familiengericht auf Herausgabe des Kindes und Übertragung des Sorgerechtes im Wege der einstweiligen Anordnung

* Herausgabebeschluss bei dem ausländischen Gericht beantragen, der mit der Gefährdung des Kindeswohls begründet wird.

* Deutsche Auslandsvertretung kann bei der Suche nach einem ortsansässigen Rechtsanwalt behilflich sein.

* Evtl. Strafantrag stellen, um den Ehepartner unter Druck zu setzen. Aber Vorsicht: Das kann die Situation aber auch unnötig verschärfen.

Sigrid Born / Nicole Würth
Redaktion: Axel Sonneborn
Moderation: Karl-Dieter Möller

Letzte Aktualisierung: 29.11.2001


Der obige Text gibt den Inhalt des Beitrags der Sendung ARD Ratgeber Recht vom 12.12.1999 ergänzt um Zusatzinformationen der Redaktion wieder. Eventuelle spätere Veränderungen des Sachverhaltes sind nicht berücksichtigt.

Die Internetangebote, die Sie hinter den von uns angegebenen Links finden, hat die Redaktion des ARD-Ratgeber Recht als weiterführende Informationen für Sie zusammengestellt, ohne sich ihren Inhalt zu eigen zu machen.

Der Redaktion des ARD-Ratgeber Recht ist es durch Gesetz untersagt, Ihnen individuellen Rechtsrat zu erteilen. Daher empfehlen wir Ihnen: Suchen Sie anwaltlichen oder notariellen Rat. Auch die Verbraucherzentralen in Ihrer Nähe können Ihnen weiterhelfen. Danke!

© SWR 2007
https://www.swr.de/ratgeber-recht/archiv/1999/12/12/index2.html

Re: Germany: CHILD ABDUCTION PREVENTION

DER GENERALBUNDESANWALT
BEIM BUNDESGERICHTSHOF
Internationale Kindesentführung
Hinweise
zur Rückführung aus dem Ausland
und
zur Durchsetzung des Umgangsrechts im Ausland

Herausgegeben vom Generalbundesanwalt beim
Bundesgerichtshof 1996, 2. neubearbeitete Auflage 1999
https://kinder-nach-hause.de/deutsch/infos/kindesentfuehrung.pdf

wwwe

outlet golden goose
huarache shoes
kobe basketball shoes
balenciaga sneakers
tory burch handbags
michael kors
huaraches
tory burch
lacoste outlet
hogan outlet online
goyard handbags
louboutin shoes
yeezy
birkin bag
off white jordan 1
kobe basketball shoes
hyperdunks
nike mercurial
converse shoes
lebron james shoes
kobe 11
adidas yeezy
moncler sale
stephen curry shoes
golden goose
michael kors outlet online
ultra boost 3.0
ultra boost
kevin durant shoes
yeezy shoes
vans outlet
jordans
adidas pure boost
john wall shoes
goyard
off white clothing
kayno
nike lebron 15
off-white
pureboost
derrick rose shoes
off white shoes
chrome hearts
caterpillar shoes
moncler jackets
air max
air max 2019
yeezy shoes
lebron 15
adidas superstar
nmd r1
hermes birkin
yeezy boost 350
kyrie irving shoes
adidas eqt
nike hyperdunk
fila online shop
nike air force
yeezy boost 350 v2
golden goose superstar
yeezy
air max 90
nike lebron 11
nike epic react flyknit
jordan 1 off white
golden goose
kobe sneakers
jordans
air max
tom ford glasses
nike outlet
jordan shoes
chrome hearts store
yeezy
yeezy 500
yeezy boost 350
yeezy shoes
yeezy boost 350
adidas eqt support adv
huarache shoes
yeezys
golden goose outlet
off white hoodie
balenciaga sneakers
cheap mlb jerseys
adidas ultra boost 3.0
nike shox outlet
balenciaga
michael kors factory outlet
nike flyknit trainer
links of london sale
hermes belts
yeezy boost
curry 4
nike air max
cheap nfl jerseys
nhl jerseys
adidas nmd
kobe shoes
hermes bag
nike air max 90
air force ones
jordan retro 13
yeezy boost 350 v2
yeezy boost
nike air max 2019
michael kors outlet handbags
cheap jordans
puma fenty
nike huarache
off white jordan 1
nike huarache
air max
cheap nhl jerseys
lebron soldier 10
yeezy shoes
lebron 15 shoes
adidas eqt support adv
adidas iniki runner
jordan retro
longchamp
golden goose sale
yeezy wave runner 700
pg 1
vans shoes
harden shoes
fila
yeezy boost 350 v2
nike air vapormax
nike roshe
true religion
hermes
kobe 9
longchamp handbags
100% real jordans for cheap
air max 90
fitflops sale clearance
nike hyperdunk 2017
adidas yeezy
calvin klein outlet
yeezy 500
cheap nfl jerseys china
jordan 13
lebron 15
jordan retro
adidas iniki
michael kors outlet store
irving shoes
hermes belt
adidas eqt
ysl handbags
longchamp bags
nike polo
pandora bracelet
yeezy 500 blush
nike cortez women
adidas flux
adidas yeezy
nike free run
nmd
adidas nmd
tom ford sunglasses
golden goose sneakers
nike air force 1 low
michael kors sale
yeezy boost 350
red bottom shoes
fila shoes
off-white
yeezy boost 350 v2
zx flux
balenciaga speed
moncler outlet
air jordan 11
nike air force
longchamp
off white hoodie
nike react
michael kors purses
air max 2017
michael kors outlet store
louboutin shoes
nike huarache
adidas stan smith men
gucci belt
balenciaga sneakers
cheap nba jerseys
yeezy sneakers
timberland shoes
adidas store
crazy explosive
michael kors outlet
nmd r1
michael kors
lebron 13
nike basketball shoes
nike epic react flyknit
golden goose starter
yeezy boost
hermes outlet online
chrome hearts outlet
nike jordans
michael kors outlet
nike zoom
off white
pandora bracelet
real jordans for sale cheap
basketball shoes
lacoste polo
hermes handbags
adidas ultra boost
kyrie 4
chrome hearts online
golden goose
moncler jackets
michael kors handbags sale
off white nike
adidas gazelle
yeezy boost
westbrook shoes
vans store
adidas stan smith
pure boost
michael kors outlet
kobe byrant shoes
nike air zoom
supreme hoodie
red bottom shoes for women
adidas tubular
curry 5
golden goose shoes
tom ford sunglasses
michael kors outlet
michael kors handbags
golden goose
yeezy boost 350
asics gel kayano
russell westbrook shoes
air max 270
michael kors outlet
yeezy 700
vapormax
nike react flyknit
adidas nmd
nike air zoom pegasus 32
michael kors handbags
adidas outlet
converse outlet
ferragamo sale
nike air max 2018
longchamp handbags
nike flyknit
curry 4
fenty puma
cheap jordan shoes
nike sneakers
pandora charms
adidas nmd
kd shoes
true religion outlet
yeezy shoes
hermes handbags
pandora charms
michael kors factory outlet
golden goose slide
yeezy boost 350 v2
dior sunglasses
converse shoes
foamposites
adidas stan smith uk
chrome hearts outlet
moncler
golden goose
kobe shoes
yeezy shoes
birkin bag
caterpillar boots
nike shox
kate spade outlet
jordan 4
adidas tubular
gucci belts
nike huarache
prada sunglasses
cheapjordans
moncler jackets
kevin durant shoes
d rose shoes
longchamp bags
yeezy
air jordan
air max 2018
kyrie 4
timberland outlet
kobe 9
adidas ultra boost
yeezy shoes
nfl jerseys
air jordans
michael kors outlet
nike shox for women
adidas yeezy boost
golden goose sneakers
nike air max
yeezys
air jordan 12
fila outlet
longchamp bags
tory burch outlet
christian louboutin shoes
air jordan 6
michael kors
lebron shoes
lebron 14
jordan shoes
yeezy
nike flyknit
yeezy
pandora jewelry
michael kors outlet online
chrome hearts
bape hoodie
adidas nmd r1
nike roshe one
basketball shoes
kate spade handbags
hermes birkin
nike air max 90
nba jerseys
yeezy boost 350
ferragamo belt
nike shoes
lebron soldier 11
lacoste online shop
prada eyeglasses
michael kors outlet online
golden goose francy
moncler
nfl jerseys
adidas shoes
paul george shoes
michael kors
fitflops sale
michael kors outlet
nike dunk low
nike air max shoes
converse outlet store
cheap jordans
kyrie 3
salvatore ferragamo belt
jordan shoes
jordan shoes
adidas yeezy boost
kobe 11
longchamp
goyard wallet
longchamp handbags
kobe byrant shoes
links of london
james harden shoes
curry 5
michael kors handbags
nike air max 2017
retro jordans
nfl store
golden goose sneakers
cheap jordans
adidas yeezy
adidas stan smith women
custom baseball jerseys
iniki
links of london
nike air force 1
adidas stan smith
goyard handbags
vibram fivefingers
nike dunks
christian louboutin
yeezy boost 350 v2
nike react
nike cortez
supreme clothing
adidas superstar UK
michael kors handbags
russell westbrook shoes
jordan 6
air jordan shoes
nike hyperdunk
christian louboutin shoes
jordan 11
goyard handbags
damian lillard shoes
yeezy boost 350
jordan shoes
pandora jewelry
hermes belt
jordan 12
supreme clothing
adidas gazelle sale
asics shoes
moncler outlet
off white jordan 1
nmd
golden goose mid star
vans shoes
fila shoes
nike air force 1 high
ferragamo belt
golden goose
calvin klein underwear
adidas ultra boost
goyard bags
longchamp
hermes birkin
adidas ultra boost 3.0
adidas nmd
nike mercurial vapor
tom ford glasses
golden goose sneakers
hermes belts
bape clothing
nike flyknit racer
curry shoes
nike air zoom structure 19
reebok outlet
jordan retro
nike air max
moncler
true religion jeans
adidas yeezy
kd 10
longchamp longchamps
adidas tubular x
hermes belt
asics sneakers
mens basketball shoes
nike air force 1
balenciaga shoes
adidas yeezy
michael kors outlet
balenciaga
bape hoodie
goyard tote
paul george shoes
mlb jerseys
hogan outlet
adidas superstar
moncler jackets